|
REPRESENTATIVE TOWN MEETING
TOWN OF GREENWICH
EXPLANATORY COMMENTS FOR
SEPTEMBER 2008 MEETING
ITEM NO.: 1 postponed from the June meeting
DEPARTMENT: Selectmen
CONTACT: Peter Crumbine 622-7710
REFERRED TO: Appointments, Land Use Committees
VOTES: Board of Selectmen 3-0-0
RESOLVED, that the following named person, nominated by the Board of Selectmen, be appointed a member of the Planning and Zoning Commission for a term expiring 3/31/11.
PAUL S. MARCHESE
Explanatory Comments
Paul S. Marchese. 15 Greenbriar Lane, Greenwich. Renomination as a member of the Planning and Zoning Commission for a term expiring 3/31/11.
BS degree – College of Art & Architecture. Masters Degree, Sociology/Urban Planning, The New York School for Social Research. Member, American Institute of Architecture, Industrial Designers Society of America.
Internationally recognized ex-chief architect of the World Trade Center and award winning residential architect.
ITEM NO.: 2 postponed from the June meeting
DEPARTMENT: Selectmen
CONTACT: Peter Crumbine 622-7710
REFERRED TO: Appointments, Land Use Committees
VOTES: Board of Selectmen 3-0-0
RESOLVED, that the following named person, nominated by the Board of Selectmen, be appointed a member of the Planning and Zoning Commission for a term expiring 3/31/11.
FRANK FARRICKER
Explanatory Comments
Frank Farricker. 14 Mead Avenue, Cob Cob. Renomination as a member of the Planning and Zoning Commission for a term expiring 3/31/11.
BA George Washington University, MA – Columbia University. SVP Real Estate Financing Company. Board member -The Mary Fund hospice care,
DEPARTMENT: Appointments Committee
REFERRED TO: Appointments Committee
VOTES:
RESOLVED, that the following named persons be appointed as alternate members of the Labor Contracts Committee for a term ending 12/31/09.
JILL OBERLANDER
M. MICHAEL WARNER
Explanatory Comments
JILL OBERLANDER
19 Bush Avenue
Greenwich, CT 06830
(203) 661-6825
EMPLOYMENT EXPERIENCE
Alliance for Downtown New York, Inc., New York, New York
General Counsel November 2001 to December 2004
Counsel January 2005 to June 2005
The Downtown Alliance is the district management association for the lower Manhattan business improvement district and provides that district with supplemental security, sanitation, economic development, marketing, tourism, and environmental enhancement services. As General Counsel, I provided legal advice on all aspects of the company’s business, including negotiation of contracts and inter-governmental agreements, preparation of materials for Board of Directors, supervision of in-house and outside counsel, and attention to state and local legislative matters.
Downtown-Lower Manhattan Association, New York, New York November 2001 to June 2005
Counsel
Provided legal advice on all aspects of Association business. Prepared and reviewed materials for Board of Directors.
Kalkines, Arky, Zall & Bernstein, LLP, New York, New York October 2000 to October 2001
Attorney, Corporate Group
Provided contract, commercial, real estate and procurement law advice to firm clients (primarily major private and quasi-governmental transportation companies). Worked with various state and federal governmental bodies.
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York, New York June 1996 to August 2000
Attorney, Corporate Group
Provided advice on general corporate matters, statutory requirements, real estate law and legal compliance. Worked on grant agreements, contracts, inter-governmental agreements, concession license agreements and parking agreements. Analyzed requirements of New York State Ethics Law, Open Meetings Law, Personal Privacy Protection Law, and applicable procurement laws. Drafted and analyzed legislative proposals. Supervised Freedom of Information Law compliance.
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, New York, New York May 1995 to June 1996
Attorney, Real Estate Department
Weil, Gotshal & Manges, New York, New York October 1993 to May 1995
Attorney, Real Estate Department
City of New York, Mayor’s Transportation Office August 1989 to August 1990
Project Planner, Environmental and Air Quality Issues
City of New York, Urban Fellows Program September 1988 to June 1989
Assistant to the Deputy Commissioner of Management, NYC Department of Parks & Recreation
EDUCATION
University of Chicago Law School, Chicago, Illinois, J.D. 1993
Cornell University, College of Arts and Sciences, Ithaca, New York, B.A. 1988
cum laude, distinction in all subjects; Major: Government/International Relations
AFFILIATIONS
Member, Representative Town Meeting, District 2, Town of Greenwich
Trustee, Sarah Neuman Center, Jewish Home Lifecare
Chair, Community Service Committee, Putnam Indian Field Nursery School
Co-Chair, Young Families Division, UJA of Greenwich
M. MICHAEL WARNER
48-7 Spring Street (203) 629-1454
CAREER SUMMARY
A Human Resources executive with extensive experience in the technology, manufacturing, and communications industries. Hands-on experience managing domestic and overseas Compensation, Benefit program development, Staffing, Labor and Employee Relations, Training, Continuous Improvement Process, Facilities Management and Administration.
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE:
Independent Consultant June 2000-June 2004 HEXCEL CORPORATION: A $1 billion
manufacturer of structural materials for aircraft and applications
.
Project Manager: installed a corporate-wide defined-contribution pension plan 401(k), replacing a legacy defined benefit plan.
Recruited a complete accounting organization, which relocated from the West Coast to the East Coast.
Independently managed 2002 Corporate Compensation planning, management incentive and stock option programs
Managed the relocation of corporate service and staff functions from Stamford to a new Wilton, CT location.
Director, HR and Administration Jan. 1996 – Jan. 1997 LORAL SPACE AND COMMUNICATIONS:
$1 billion international provider of space satellites and communications
Mergers & Acquisitions: Independently managed all HR issues related to major corporate acquisition, including integration of Company Policies, Shared Services, Labor Relations issues, incentive programs and key employee retention strategies.
HR Organization Start Up: From scratch started up the Corporate HR and Administration functions for this $1billion international provider of space satellites and satellite channels.
Benefits Management: Renegotiated health cares contracts; saved $ 1 million in health care premiums over legacy medical care program.
Approved labor contracts negotiated with various divisions of the Company
Administration: Independently managed corporate facilities including major renovations, security, OSHA requirements, insurance and real estate issues for Manhattan for corporate office.
Vice President Human Resources April 1990-March 1996 LORAL ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS:
$300 million multinational division of Loral Corporation, designer and
producer of electronic systems under DOD contract.
Continuous Improvement Program Teams: Installed company-wide “best practices” and “benchmarking” program covering administrative and manufacturing operations.
Recruitment: Managed large-scale high technology recruitment of scientists and engineers initiating the Companies first extensive college “fresh-out” recruitment program.
Start-Up: Installed, on site, an operating HR function for a subsidiary in Ankara, Turkey.
Government/Customer Compliance Programs: Installed and managed compliance programs mandated by DOD and major customers.
Incentive Compensation/Bonus/Recognition Programs: Managed the installation of updated recognition and reward programs
Labor Relations: Executive management representative on Loral’s labor negotiating team, negotiated contracts with IUE #431
Director, HR Programs 1983-1990
Compensation: Developed and installed comprehensive, competitive, benchmarked, job evaluation and pay-for-performance system, compensation and expatriate allowance programs, and managed government compliance programs.
Benefits: Updating plan provisions dramatically reduced ballooning health care costs.
Compensation representative for the companys Labor Negotiating Team
Manager, Compensation 1977-1983
Installed first custom-designed compensation and merit reward program. Introduced the company’s first comprehensive
“fast track” bonus reward program for key employees.
Wrote the Company’s first Compensation and Benefits policy.
Developed management and supervisory training programs related to policy implementation.
MISCELLANEOUS
Member of the St. Paul’s Chapel, New York volunteer team. Prepared food for recovery workers in the wake of WTC collapse on September 11,
Former literacy volunteer.
Board of Directors, Westchester United Way, 1993-1995
EDUCATION
BA degree. University of Maryland, College Park, MD. Major: English Minor: Philosophy.
DEPARTMENT: Hamilton Ave. Building Committee
REFERRED TO: Education, Finance Committees
VOTES:
RESOLVED, that the sum of $500,000 be and the same is hereby appropriated to be added to Capital Account Number Z6801792 59550 25110, known as Hamilton Avenue School Reconstruction. Said appropriation to come from the Capital and Non-Recurring Fund.
EXPLANATORY COMMENTS
The Building Committee has voted to request additional funds in the amount of $500,000 to permit the completion of the Hamilton Ave. School. This request is the collaborative effort of the Building Committee, the Board of Education, and the First Selectman’s Office. Despite the best efforts of the School Building Committee additional funds are necessary to provide for numerous potential change orders (PCO’s) that are needed to meet requirements of the State Building code for the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy (TCO) and ultimately, a Certificate of Occupancy (CO). Some of these PCO’s are in dispute with the builder and the Town’s obligation for payment will not be resolved until some later date. In order to permit the work to continue to completion it was
deemed critical by the members of the Building Committee, the Board of Education and the Office of the First Selectman that the work be accomplished as expeditiously as possible. The issue of how many of these potential change orders are the Town’s obligation versus the responsibility of other parties will have to be determined at a later date by other bodies. However, in order to carry on it was viewed as essential that sufficient funds be available to permit the PCO’s to be authorized.
The above members also believed that the primary goal at this time was to reopen the Hamilton Ave. School as quickly as possible for the benefit of the children of the school and to lessen other costs that the Town is incurring as a result of the dispersion plan implemented for Hamilton Ave and Glenville schools. The Members of the Building Committee, the Office of the First Selectmen and the Board of Education support this request for additional funds and urges your concurrence.
Additional details on the use of these funds will be provided as they become available.
DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation Department 0809PR01
REFERRED TO: Finance, Parks & Recreation Committees
VOTES: Board of Parks and Recreation vote 6-0-0
Board of Selectmen 3-0-0
Planning and Zoning Commission 5-0-0
RESOLVED, that the Town of Greenwich accept a gift totaling $600,000 from the Junior League of Greenwich, Connecticut, Inc. for the renovation of the Bruce Park playground.
EXPLANATORY COMMENTS
Explanation by the Director of Parks and Recreation:
Objective
The Department of Parks & Recreation respectfully requests that the members of the RTM accept a gift of $600,000 from the Junior League of Greenwich (JLG) to the Town. The total value of the renovated Bruce Park playground is $750,000, which includes the 2007-08 RTM approved appropriation of $150,000 from the Capital Improvement budget. The goal is for the renovated playground to be unveiled in the spring of 2009, when the JLG will be celebrating its 50th anniversary of service in the Greenwich community.
Original JLG Bruce Park Playground Gift
In 1993, the JLG set out to enhance the playgrounds in Greenwich. The JLG’s “Playground Pals” initiative resulted in a partnership with the Town to renovate the playground at Bruce Park, for which the RTM accepted a $250,000 gift from the JLG in 1995.
At the time of the installation, the Bruce Park playground was considered state-of-the art and unique, and was one of the few playgrounds serving families with children of all age ranges from toddlers to pre-teens. Today, the Bruce Park playground is still one the largest, most frequently used playgrounds within the Town.
After years of heavy use, the Bruce Park playground needs renovation. The JLG / Town would like to again create a renewed, modern playground at Bruce Park, incorporating the latest in playground philosophy and design brought on by the:
advent of universal design principles
advances in understanding how children develop
growing population of children with special needs in the community
need for total family activities.
Boundless Playground
The JLG has become a member of the Boundless Playgrounds program. Boundless Playgrounds, founded in 1997 and based in Connecticut, is the first national, non-profit organization dedicated to helping communities create extraordinary playgrounds where all children, with and without disabilities, can develop essential skills for life as they learn together through play.
A Boundless playground isn’t just another playground. And it isn’t a playground just for children with disabilities. It is a new, modern playground designed for the needs of all children and how they play. The difference between a Boundless playground and a traditional playground is in the subtle design features that one might not notice, but that make a profound difference to a child or adult with special needs, such as:
a) Every child can reach the highest play level
b) Play structures are configured to support all children’s development
c) Pathways and surfacing are universally accessible
d) Cozy gathering and away spaces provide a rest from the action
e) Equipment such as swings with back support
f) Sensory-rich and ground level play activities
Boundless Playground assists communities in vendor selection and playground design and certifies completed playgrounds as “Boundless.” There are more than 120 Boundless playgrounds in over 20 states and Canada and dozens more are currently in development.
Other Key Elements of the Proposed Bruce Park Playground
For this project, the JLG hired TO Design LLC, a New Britain, CT-based landscape architecture and civil engineering firm whose associates are recognized for creating landscape designs that preserve and embrace natural features. Furthermore, TO Design is known for creating playgrounds that incorporate progressive, universally inclusive Boundless features. Key characteristics of the newly designed playground are:
The preservation of Bruce Park’s beautiful bucolic features as large mature trees, rock outcroppings, and the view to Smith Cove;
The footprint remains the same with no expansion into the surrounding rock ledge buffer area;
A generous amount of passive and active recreation areas, including ample seating with benches and picnic tables, and open spaces to throw a blanket and relax;~
Cost-effective design using existing bathrooms, ADA compliant pathways, water fountains, and parking lots (which will be restriped for additional handicap parking spaces);
Play areas that evoke the park’s history as a Native American Siwanoy and Boy Scouts camp site;
The majority of the playground will be accessible to all children, the elderly, and others with special needs.
Financials
Playground
The playground’s renovation is valued at $750,000.
In 2007-08, the Town RTM approved $150,000 from the CIP budget for the renovation of the Bruce Park playground.
In addition, through the JLG’s own town-wide fundraising efforts, such as the Enchanted Forest and Touch a Truck, the JLG has committed $150,000 from its own funds for the renovation.
Further, the JLG has also added an important partner to the project, The United Way of Greenwich. The United Way is marking their 75th anniversary in serving the Greenwich community. In celebration of this important anniversary, United Way is joining the JLG on this project, which demonstrates both the JLG and United Way’s commitment to many common causes, including children and the elderly. Thus, the United Way has matched the JLG contribution sum of $150,000.
Finally, the JLG is raising the remaining $300,000 through grants, foundations, and corporate and individual donors as they have done in their previous capital-intensive projects. The JLG has raised over half the amount at $155,000 towards the goal.
Thus, at this date, the total Bruce Park renovation project is nearly 90% funded.
Previous Brick Donors
The donors from the 1995 playground renovation project will continue to be recognized. The new playground design has incorporated the existing donor bricks to be used once again in a beautiful pattern among the pathways throughout the playground.
Maintenance
In addition to $700,000 for the playground renovation itself, the JLG will establish and manage an equipment maintenance fund in the amount of $50,000 for repair and upkeep during the 10-year life expectancy of the playground.
JLG/Town Permits Granted
In July 2008, the Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously approved Municipal Improvement status and the final site plan for the renovation at the Bruce Park playground. Prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission’s approval, in April 2008, the Board of Selectmen granted Municipal Improvement status for the project, also in April 2008 the Board of Parks and Recreation granted its formal approval as well.
Community Support
The JLG formed an advisory committee to ensure broad community input to the project. The following are members of the Bruce Park Boundless Playground’s Community Advisory Board:
Stuart Adelberg, President & CEO, United Way
William S. Dunster, Town of Greenwich Board of Parks and Recreation
Doug Fainelli, Former Principal Old Greenwich and Dundee schools
Honorable Livvy R. Floren, Connecticut State Representative
Icy Frantz, Community Advisor and Author
Laurel Ross, President, Abilis/ARC
Dr. Benjamin D. Roye, Orthopedic Surgeon, Greenwich Hospital
Katherine Quinn, Educational Advisor, Eagle Hill School
Alice Stuart, Abilis/ARC Board Member
Alison Troy, Community Advisor and Former Chair of Playground Pals
Martha Zoubek, Bruce Museum Board Member and Neighborhood Resident
In addition, the JLG has conducted relevant research and held meetings with service providers and parents of children with special needs in order to understand the community needs regarding the renovation of the Bruce Park playground.
Timeline
Upon RTM gift acceptance the JLG/Town Parks & Recreation Department will break ground in October 2008 and begin construction. The playground will be closed until the ribbon cutting ceremony in the spring of 2009.
Attachments –
Separate packet
Schematic of Bruce Park Playground
NY Times Article, July 6, 2008
DEPARTMENT: Public Works
REFERRED TO: Public Works, Transportation Committees
VOTES: N/A
Reconstruction of Riversville Road Bridge and possible road realignment, from Sherwood Avenue to 700 ft. south of bridge.
WHEREAS, the Town of Greenwich has published a legal notice display ad, mailed a news release to a number of officials and agencies, and mailed a formal letter to abutting property owners, announcing a public information meeting on the proposed STP Rural Minor Transportation project known as Riversville Road Bridge Reconstruction, Town Project No. 05-13; and
WHEREAS, a public informational meeting was held on June 14, 2007, at Greenwich Town Hall from 7:00 PM to 8:30 P.M., at which meeting residents had an opportunity to voice their concerns; and
WHEREAS, the Southwestern Regional Planning Agency has selected this project as a regional priority and to utilize federal funds for right-of-way, preliminary engineering and construction activities; and
WHEREAS, the Representative Town Meeting (RTM) has considered the concerns of the residents from the public informational meeting and finds that the proposed Riversville Road Bridge Reconstruction is in the best interest of the Town of Greenwich, and will promote the health, safety and general welfare of its residents and provide for convenience and safety of the motoring public.
WHEREAS, the Town of Greenwich, based on the above information, and by virtue of this resolution, hereby fully supports the proposed project.
DEPARTMENT: Public Works 0909PW02
REFERRED TO: Finance, Public Works Committees
VOTES: July 21, 2008 BET, 12-0-0
RESOLVED, that the sum of $200,000 be and the same is hereby appropriated to be added to Capital Account Number Z345-59560-28023, known as “Art Barn (GEMS Station)”.
EXPLANATORY COMMENTS
Rehabilitation of the Art Barn
Interim funds are being requested to cover the architectural redesign and construction contingency to undertake the rehabilitation of the Art Barn. The Art Barn is located on Lower Cross Road next to the Parkway School and is used by GEMS as a remote response location.
The rehabilitation of the Art Barn has a long history. The first request for funds, $500,000, was part of the FY04/05 budget. Because of issues with the Parkway School well, which serves both the school and the Art Barn, the project was delayed until the school wells were brought up to code.
The first request for bid for the actual rehabilitation occurred in December 2005 and this plan called for demolishing portions of the building to reduce the square footage and then rehabilitate the remaining structure. Because the existing building was designed for a different use, major alterations had to be undertaken for it to accept the GEMS function. The resulting plan, which totally renovated the interior, left many of the areas in a non-conforming state as compared to present day standards. The subsequent competitive bid to undertake this work came in at $965,000 and was nearly 100% over the original estimate.
In an effort to reduce the cost of the project, a plan was devised to replace the existing structure with a new building at the proper square footage. The estimated cost of this new option, $880,000, was lower than the bid value of original rehabilitation plan while providing a modern conforming structure.
An additional appropriation for $380,000 was approved as part of the FY07/08 budget to provide funds to undertake the new plan. Unfortunately, this new plan, which included demolition of the existing structure, met with opposition due to the building’s age. DPW met with the Historic District Commission to work out a compromise. In September 2007, a plan was agreed upon to demolish all of the existing building additions except the large barn structure which would be rehabilitated and connected to a new two bay vehicle garage.
This plan was competitively bid in June 2008; the low bid came in at $861,689. The account status of the project has minimal funds remaining and requires at least a 20% contingency fund to cover any construction change notices that may be encountered. Further, the architectural service for the redesign effort requires an additional $26,300.
Project Account Status:
Account Number Budget Balance
Z345-59560-25038 $500,000 $485,482
Z345-59560-28023 $380,000 $379,848
$880,000
Total Available Funds $865,330
Low Bid ($861,689)
Account Balance $ 3,641
Interim Funding Request
Contingency @ 20% $172,338
Architectural Fee $ 26,300
Interim Request Total $198,639
DEPARTMENT: Board of Education
REFERRED TO: Education, Finance, Labor Contracts Committees
VOTES: Board of Education August 28, 2008 (pending)
RESOLVED, that the Representative Town Meeting of the Town of Greenwich hereby approves such provisions of the tentative collective bargaining agreement between the Board of Education and the Public Service Employees Local, 136, of Laborers International Union of North America AFL-CIO for the period covering July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2010, if any, which may be in conflict with any charter provisions, special act, ordinance, rule, or regulation of the Town of Greenwich within the meaning of Connecticut General Statutes, Section 7-474.
Sense of the Meeting Resolution
WHEREAS Connecticut statutes confer upon the Board of Education the exclusive authority to approve a collective bargaining agreement with Public Service Employees Local, 136, of Laborers International Union of North America AFL-CIO (“LIUNA BOE”), and
WHEREAS in order to provide the RTM the opportunity to both comment upon the tentative agreement for the period covering July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2010, and to express its approval or disapproval prior to the Board’s acting on the agreement, the Board proposes the following RTM sense of the meeting resolution:
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that it is the sense of the Representative Town Meeting of the Town of Greenwich that it supports the Board’s tentative collective bargaining agreement with LIUNA BOE.
EXPLANATORY COMMENTS
The Board of Education (BOE) Negotiations Committee has reached a tentative agreement with the LIUNA BOE union (Local 136 of the AFL-CIO, which represents the professional assistants and security personnel) and is beginning the contract approval process.
The first resolution relates to a specific contract provision changing the pension vesting period from ten (10) to five (5) years.
The second Sense of the Meeting Resolution provides an opportunity for RTM involvement even though the Connecticut MERA (Municipal Employees Relations Act) act gives the BOE the authority to approve the agreement. This BOE feels strongly that, as part of the Town’s political and financial checks and balances system, it is necessary and proper that the RTM have the opportunity to provide input on the contract before it is approved by the BOE. At its regularly scheduled meeting on August 28th the BOE will consider a Sense of the Meeting Resolution in support of the proposed contract. Pending additional input from the RTM, approval of an RTM Sense of the Meeting Resolution, and RTM approval of a second resolution addressing certain contract provisions, the Board
of Education would then consider final approval of the contract at its regular September 25th meeting.
~~~~~~~~~~
Attachments:
Separate packet
1. Comptroller’s Certification of Contract Costs
2. June 17, 2004 Opinion issued by Town Attorney
DEPARTMENT: Selectmen
CONTACT: Peter Crumbine 622-7710
REFERRED TO: Appointments, Town Services
VOTES: Board of Selectmen 3-0-0
RESOLVED, that the following named person, nominated by the Board of Selectmen, be appointed a member of the Alarm Appeals Board for a term expiring 3/31/12.
BRIAN M. KELLY
Explanatory Comments
Brian M. Kelly. 34 1/2 River Road, Cos Cob. New nomination as a regular member of the Alarm Appeals Board for a term expiring 3/31/12.
AAS: Business Admin-Customer Relations, BBA-Mgt., MS Counseling specialization Human Resoures.
Volunteer Fire Fighter Recruitment and Retention Coordinator for the Town. Member of Greenwich Youth Council, Mianus River Boat and Yacht Club, CT Fire Police Assoc., Job coaching and Kiwanis Club of Greenwich.
DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation Department 0809PR02
REFERRED TO: Legislative & Rules, Parks & Recreation Committees
VOTES: Board of Selectmen July 15, 2008 3-0-0 Board of Parks and Recreation December 11, 2007 8-0-0
Be it Ordained and Enacted by the Representative Town Meeting that:
RESOLVED, that the Greenwich Ordinance entitled Chapter 13, “Trees and Vegetation” of the Greenwich Municipal Code is hereby amended in the following sections as submitted herewith.
CHAPTER 13. TREES AND VEGETATION.
ARTICLE 1. TREES IN PUBLIC HIGHWAYS.
§13-1. Trees in public highways; permit; grantPurpose.
§13-2. Trees; property of townDefinitions.
§13-3. Penalty for planting without permitUrban/Community Forestry Management Plan;
§13-4. Effect of ArticleTree Warden as Liaison to other municipal departments.
ARTICLE 2. TREE WARDEN REGULATIONS.
§13-5. DefinitionsPubic Utilities.
§13-6. ProhibitionTrees on town-owned property.
§13-7. PermitsTrees; property of town.
§13-8. WorkPenalty for planting without permit.
§13-9. EmergenciesEffect of Article.
§13-10.PenaltiesProhibition.
§13-11.No exemptionPermits
§13-12. Work
§13-13. Emergencies
§13-14. No Exemption
§13-15. Interfering with planting, maintenance and removal
§13-16. Tree protection during construction
§13-17. Hazardous tree management
ARTICLE 1. TREES IN PUBLIC HIGHWAYS.
Sec. 13-1. Purpose
a) To promote and protect the public health, safety and general welfare of the residents by providing for the regulation of the planting, maintenance, protection and the removal of trees, shrubs and other vegetation within the Town of Greenwich.
b) To recognize and appreciate that trees produce oxygen, capture carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, provide air purification, prevent soil erosion, control flooding, assist in water purification, contribute to the quality of life by providing cooling shade, provide habitat for wildlife, reduce noise levels, and aesthetically enhance the landscape.
c) To preserve and protect trees and their canopies as an important environmental and cultural resource that enhances the Town’s natural character and heritage
d) To protect the people in the Town of Greenwich from personal injury and property damage caused by the improper planting, maintenance, protection or removal of trees and shrubs located within the Town of Greenwich. To protect property values by maintaining a healthy and vigorous community forest.
Sec. 13-2. Definitions
a) Tree Warden (aka Town Forester): The Greenwich Tree Warden shall be the Superintendent of the Parks & Trees Division of the Department of Parks & Recreation, and shall have all the powers, duties and authority provided by Connecticut Public Shade Tree as may be amended and Town of Greenwich Tree Ordinance. The term Tree Warden may also refer to any appointed Deputy Tree Warden working for or reporting to the Tree Warden.
b) Deputy Tree Warden (aka Assistant Town Forester): The Greenwich Deputy Tree Warden shall be appointed by the Tree Warden. The Deputy Tree Warden may be the Tree Operations Manager of the Parks and Trees Division and/or any other suitable person the Tree Warden deems reasonable and appropriate.
c) Urban / Community Forest: The natural and dynamic resource of all Town-owned trees upon street right-of-ways, parks, school campuses, open space properties, and grounds of Town facilities taken collectively comprise the Town’s Urban / Community Forest.
d) Town-owned Property: Any and all property owned by the Town of Greenwich.
e) Hazard Tree, Hazardous Tree: in relation to a tree or tree part, shall mean defective, diseased or dead, and posing an unreasonable risk of failure or fracture with the potential to cause injury to people or damage to property.
f) Property Owner: The owner of record or contract purchaser of any parcel of land.
g) Tree: A woody plant, usually with one main trunk, reaching a height of at least fifteen feet when mature.
h) Shrub: A woody plant, branched from the base, generally less than fifteen feet in height when mature.
i) Vegetation: all other plants and vines not defined as trees or shrubs
i) Arboricultural Specifications and Standards of Practice (hereinafter, “Arboricultural Specifications and Policy Manual”). A manual prepared by the Tree Warden pursuant to the ordinance containing regulations and standards for the planting, maintenance, removal and the protection of trees, shrubs and other plants upon Town-owned property
j) Person: Any person, firm or corporation including any public utility.
k) Urban / Community Forestry Plan: The long range management plan and resulting annual work plans prepared by the Tree Warden from data collected by the Urban /Community Forestry Inventory.
l) Public Nuisance: Any tree, shrub or other vegetation “which is hazardous or injurious to the public health, safety and welfare or which causes substantial depreciation in the value of real property in the neighborhood” (as defined in Town of Greenwich Nuisance Ordinance).
m) Forest Management: Management: to maintain and enhance long-term health of forest ecosystems, while providing economic, social and cultural opportunities for the benefit of present and future generations
Sec. 13-3 Urban / Community Forestry Management Plan
a) The Tree Warden shall prepare, in coordination with the Conservation Commission, a long-range, comprehensive strategic plan for the administration and management of a community forestry program.
b) The Tree Warden shall prepare and implement The Urban Forestry Management Plan based on a detailed tree inventory on Town-owned property. The management plan will identify and prioritize site-specific tree planting, maintenance and removal activities within a multi-year time frame.
Sec. 13-4 Tree Warden as Liaison to other municipal departments:
a) The Tree Warden shall serve as liaison to the Board of Selectmen, Land Use Department, Planning, Conservation Commission, Inland Wetlands Agency, Architectural Review Committee, and the Department of Public Works on all matters relating to individual trees and forest resources, and may provide technical assistance as appropriate.
b) Any Town department shall notify the Tree Warden of any applications for new curb, gutter, sidewalks or driveway installations, utility installations or other improvements which might require the removal of or cause injury to any Town-owned tree.
Sec 13-5 Public Utilities:
a) Any public utility maintaining any overhead wires or underground pipes or conduits shall obtain permission from the Tree Warden before performing any maintenance work on the wires, pipes, or conduits which would cause injury to street trees. The public utility shall in no way injure, deface, prune, or scar any street tree until their plans and procedures have been approved by the Tree Warden.
b) When maintaining street trees, a public utility must observe good arboricultural practices, as specified by the Pruning Standards located in the current version of the Greenwich Arboricultural Specifications and Policy Manual.
Sec. 13-16. Trees in public highwayson Town-owned property; permit; grant.
(a) No person shall plant any tree, bush or shrub within the limits of any public highway town-owned property without having first obtained a permit to do so from the Tree Warden. Written application for such permission shall be made to the Tree Warden setting forth the size, species, type and location of each tree, bush or shrub, for which such permission is requested.
(b) The Tree Warden shall consider the effect of planting the specified trees, bushes or shrubs upon the general welfare of the community and upon the present and future use, safety, maintenance, development and improvement of the highway town-owned property for all lawful purposes.
Subject to the direction and control of the Director of Parks and Recreation, the Tree Warden shall grant or deny the applications upon the basis of such considerations.
(Ords. & Reg., §7-2, 8/17/48.)
Sec. 13-16. Trees in public highwayson Town-owned property; permit; grant.
(a) No person shall plant any tree, bush or shrub within the limits of any public highway town-owned property without having first obtained a permit to do so from the Tree Warden. Written application for such permission shall be made to the Tree Warden setting forth the size, species, type and location of each tree, bush or shrub, for which such permission is requested.
(b) The Tree Warden shall consider the effect of planting the specified trees, bushes or shrubs upon the general welfare of the community and upon the present and future use, safety, maintenance, development and improvement of the highway town-owned property for all lawful purposes.
Subject to the direction and control of the Director of Parks and Recreation, the Tree Warden shall grant or deny the applications upon the basis of such considerations.
(Ords. & Reg., §7-2, 8/17/48.)
Sec. 13-27. Trees; property of town.
Any tree, bush or shrub planted within the limits of the public highways of the towntown-owned property shall become the property of the town.
(Ords. & Reg., §7-2, 8/17/48.)
Sec. 13-38. Penalty for planting without permit.
If any person plants any tree, bush or shrub without obtaining the required permit, he shall be fined not more than twenty-five dollars ($25.) and shall remove the same at his expense within a period of thirty (30) days.
(Ords. & Reg., §7-3, 8/17/48.)
Sec. 13-49. Effect of Article.
Nothing in this Article and no permit granted pursuant to this Article shall be deemed to prejudice any rights which the town may now or hereafter have with respect to trees, bushes and shrubs planted within the limits of the public highways of the towntown-owned property.
(Ords. $ Reg., §7-4, 8/17/48.)
ARTICLE 2. TREE WARDEN REGULATIONS.
.
Sec. 13-5. Definitions.
As used in this Article:
Person is any person, firm or corporation including any public utility.
(10/15/1990.)
Sec. 13-610. Prohibition
Except as otherwise provided herein, no person shall cut, trim, prune, remove, injure or interfere with any tree, shrub or cultivated plant, including the branches, trunk root system or crown thereof, in whole or in part, within the limits of any public road, park or public grounds in the Town of Greenwich without a permit from the Tree Warden.
(10/15/1990.)
Sec. 13-711. Permits.
Permits are issued in conformity with the General Statutes. Application for permits must be made on application forms provided for such purpose by the Tree Warden. Permits expire thirty (30) days after the date of issue unless otherwise noted thereon by the Tree Warden.
(10/15/1990.)
Sec. 13-812. Work.
All work performed on such trees, shrubs or cultivated plants shall be done in strict accordance with the permit and under the direction of the Tree Warden.
Sec. 13-913. Emergencies
Work which, in the opinion of the Tree Warden, is of an emergency nature, such as failure of gas, water or electric utility lines, may be performed as orally prescribed by the Tree Warden at the expense of the person requesting same.
(10/15/1990.)
Sec. 13-10. Penalties
(a) Any person violating any provision of these regulations shall be fined not more than ninety dollars ($90.).
(b) Any person who unlawfully or willfully removes, prunes, injures or defaces any tree or shrub within the limits of a public way or public grounds without proper authority shall be fined not more than one hundred dollars (100.) for each separate offense and shall be liable civilly for damages [Connecticut General Statutes, Section 23-65(b)].
(c) For any tree or shrubbery unlawfully cut, destroyed or carried away, the Tree Warden may seek recovery of three (3) times the value of the tree or shrubbery pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes, Section 52-560.
(d) Any person who affixes to a telegraph, telephone, electric light or power pole, tree, shrub, rock or other natural object in any public way or grounds a playbill, picture, notice, advertisement or other similar thing or cuts, paints or marks any tree, shrub, rock or other natural object or uses climbing spurs for the purpose of climbing any tree within the limit of any public highway or grounds shall be fined not more than fifty dollars ($50.) for each offense. Each affixing, cutting, painting, marking or climbing shall be considered a separate offense [Connecticut General Statutes, Section 23-65(a)].
(e) The fixing of any playbill, picture, notice, advertisement or other similar thing concerning the business or affairs of any person, firm or corporation to a tree, shrub, rock or other natural object within the limits of any public way or grounds by an agent or employee of such person shall be deemed to be the act of such person, and such person, or any member of such firm or any officer of such corporation, as the case may be, shall be subject to the penalty therein provided, unless such act is shown to have been done without his knowledge or consent [Connecticut General Statutes, Section 23-65(d)].
(f) The affixing of each individual playbill, picture, notice, advertisement or other similar thing to a tree, shrub, rock or other natural object or the willful removing, pruning, injuring or defacing of each tree or shrub shall constitute a separate violation. Nothing in this section shall affect the authority of the Tree Warden to remove, prune or otherwise deal with a tree or shrub under his jurisdiction [Connecticut General Statutes, Section 23-65(e)].
(10/15/90; 4/1/1991.)
Sec. 13-1114. No exemption.
Nothing herein contained shall be deemed to exempt any person from the application of any other applicable statute, ordinance, regulation or rule.
(10/15/1990).
Sec. 13-15 Interference with planting, maintenance, and removal
No person, firm or corporation shall interfere with the Tree Warden or persons acting under his authority while engaged in planting, mulching, pruning, removing or maintaining any tree, shrub or plant on Town-owned property.
Sec. 13 –16 Tree Protection During Construction Activities
All trees on public property that are designated for preservation shall be protected in accordance with the Tree Protection Specifications section of the Arboricultural Specifications and Policy Manual.
Sec. 13-17 Hazardous Tree Management
a. Public Property: The Parks and Trees Division shall evaluate the dead, diseased or structurally damaged tree as to the degree of hazard. This evaluation may be made by using the standards as set out in the Arboricultural Specifications and Policy Manual. Dead, diseased or structurally damaged public trees that pose a safety or health risk to the public or to other trees shall be removed by the Department of Parks & Recreation, Parks and Trees Division in a timely manner.
Private Property: Any tree or part of tree that poses an unreasonable risk to the public right-of-way or public property and is determined to pose imminent threat to the public health, safety or welfare by the Tree Warden shall be determined to be a ‘public nuisance’ and is to be abated by the Town in accordance with the Town of Greenwich Nuisance Ordinance as stated in Chapter 6C of the Town of Greenwich Municipal Code.
Deletions: strike thru
Additions: underlined
EXPLANATORY COMMENTS
Trees in Greenwich which occupy the Town’s roadsides, parks, school campuses and other Town properties are a valuable natural resource. These trees are assets worthy of preservation, protection and proper management. The intent of the ordinance is to provide for a long-term program for the protection, care and management of these assets.
The proposed ordinance is an amendment to the current ordinance pertaining to Trees and Vegetation (Chapter 13 of the Greenwich Municipal Code). An update of the Code is needed as the current version is outdated and incomplete. The changes consist of additions to the current Code, as well as amendments to the sections which have been retained. The changes reflect the current practices to maintain a high standard of management of Greenwich’s Community Forest for future generations.
The Tree Ordinance will also create an Arboricultural Specifications and Policy Manual, which is a guidebook prepared by the Tree Warden containing standards for the planting, maintenance, removal and protection of trees, shrubs and other plants on Town-owned property.
The ordinance pertains to Town-owned trees, with one exception. It provides for the protection of the public and of public property from dangerous trees on private property. The ordinance directs that these matters would be addressed under the parameters set by the Town’s Nuisance Ordinance.
Attachments
The revisions to the Greenwich Ordinance entitled Chapter 13, “Trees and Vegetation” of the Greenwich Municipal Code.
DEPARTMENT: Police Department 0809PD01
CONTACT: David C. Ridberg 622-8010 N/A
REFERRED TO: Town Services
VOTES: Board of Estimate and Taxation - Approved by Vote of 12-0-0 First Selectman Tesei
RESOLVED, that the Greenwich Police Department accept a monetary donation from Greenwich Emergency Medical Services in the amount of $8,000. This donation will be used towards the purchase and installation of a boat crane to be used for rescues.
EXPLANATORY COMMENTS
We respectfully request permission to accept an $8,000 monetary donation from Greenwich Emergency Medical Services to be used towards the purchase and installation of a crane. The crane will be installed on Police Boat #124 and will be used to remove injured persons from the water.
GEMS paramedics accompany our marine personnel on weekends, holidays, and special events and recognize the need for a crane. This device will allow personnel to safely extract patients from the water without causing further injuries. GEMS has graciously offered to contribute $8,000 to assist in acquiring the crane.
In September of 2006 the Department received approval to transfer $14,000 from the Federal Asset Forfeiture account to purchase a Hydraulic Marine Davit; however, we were unaware that amount did not allow for installation. Since that time costs for materials have increased, and the currency exchange rate versus the Canadian dollar has worsened.
The total amount required for purchase of the crane, including shipping and installation, is $24,939. The combined funding from GEMS and the Police Department will leave a shortage of approximately $2,939, which will be absorbed by the Marine Section maintenance account.
DEPARTMENT: Petition from 20 Registered Voters
CONTACT: Mary Ferry 637-9385 Fred Baker 637-0525
REFERRED TO: All Committees
VOTES: N/A
WHEREAS the town faces a challenge in holding the mill rate increase to the 3.5% range while addressing a large and growing want for infrastructure replacement and enhancements, and doing these within a five year pay-as-you-go debt constraint, and
WHEREAS, RTM members are concerned about fiscal restraint, and
WHEREAS the RTM desires to inform the BET regarding its thinking insofar as Operating and capital expenditures and their effect on the mill rate and borrowing,
NOW THEREFORE, the RTM recommends that the BET:
maintain the annual mill rate increases in the 3-4% range over the next
several years;
limit borrowing for capital expenditures payable from taxes (including revenue
bonds) to maturities not greater than 5 years in total, including bond anticipation
notes issued to fund the project during construction; and
not capitalize BAN interest for general obligation bonds.
This resolution does not apply to borrowing which is outside the General Fund, such as Nathaniel Witherell and Sewers.
EXPLANATORY COMMENTS
Separate packet
DEPARTMENT: First Selectman
REFERRED TO: Land Use, Legislative & Rules Committees
VOTES: Board or commission name vote (y/n/a)
PROPOSED RTM RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE TAX ABATEMENTS FOR PROPERTY CONVEYED TO A NONPROFIT LAND CONSERVATION ORGANIZATION
RESOLVED, TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO PUBLIC ACT 07-170 APPROVED ON JUNE 29, 2007.
WHEREAS, Public Act 07-170 was approved on June 29, 2007; and
WHEREAS, Public Act 07-170 permits any municipality to abate real or personal property taxes due with respect to any tax paid or payable by a nonprofit land conservation organization; and
WHEREAS, such an ordinance must be approved by the legislative body of the municipality; and
WHEREAS, the Town desires to adopt such ordinance pursuant to Public Act 07-170 and to make it applicable to property transfers that occur on or after July 1, 2008.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY ORDAINED, that the Representative Town Meeting of the Town of Greenwich hereby approves the ordinance attached hereto and made a part hereof to abate certain real and personal property taxes due by a nonprofit land conservation organization.
TAX ABATEMENT ORDINANCE FOR NONPROFIT LAND
CONSERVATION ORGANIZATIONS
For transfers on or after July 1, 2008, of property exempt or that became exempt by reason of its acquisition by a nonprofit land conservation organization, under § 12-81(7) of the Connecticut General Statutes and Section 12-1 of the Municipal Code of the Town of Greenwich, the real and personal property taxes due for any portion of a tax year paid or payable by a nonprofit land conservation organization shall be abated, even if the real and personal property taxes were due for a period before the date of acquisition but were paid or became payable subsequent to the date of acquisition, but in no case shall delinquent taxes or interest thereon be abated.
EXPLANATORY COMMENTS
State Enabling Legislation
In June 2007, the State Legislature enacted Public Act 07-170 (a copy of which appears at the end of these Explanatory Comments) which allows a municipality, “upon approval by its legislative body, to abate real or personal property taxes due for any portion of a tax year or the interest on delinquent taxes with respect to any tax paid by a nonprofit land conservation organization that were due for a period before the date of acquisition but which were paid subsequent to the date of acquisition.” This legislation is applicable to assessment years commencing on or after October 1, 2007.
The Greenwich Land Trust initiated the request for a Town ordinance in accordance with Public Act 07-170.
Greenwich’s Current Tax Exemption and Abatement Provisions
Taxes in Greenwich are assessed every year for the period October 1 to September 30. This is the Assessment Year. The Town’s Fiscal Year runs from July 1 to June 30. Payments on tax bills for an Assessment Year are due and payable during the following Fiscal Year in two installments – the first payment is due on July 1 and the second payment is due on the following January 1.
For example, if real property is assessed as of October 1, 2007 (for the 2007 Assessment Year which runs from October 1, 2007 to September 30, 2008), the first tax bill is due on July 1, 2008 and the second tax bill is due on January 1, 2009.
However, although the mill rate will not be set until the RTM adopts the budget in the following May 2008 and the taxes will not become due until the following July 2008 and January 2009, a tax lien arises on October 1, 2007, and the owner of the property is liable for the taxes from October 1, 2007. Interlude, Inc. v. Skurat, 266 Conn. 130, 141, 831 A.2d 235 (2003).
The Connecticut General Statutes provide tax exemptions for certain types of organizations. Section 12-81(7) of the General Statutes provides an exemption for property used for scientific, educational, literary, historical or charitable purposes. Land trusts acquiring or owning property qualify as one of the types of organizations pursuant to General Statutes § 12-81(7).
Greenwich has adopted an ordinance on property tax exemptions pursuant to General Statutes § 12-81. See Greenwich Municipal Code, Chapter 12, Article 1. Under the Town ordinance, a land trust can apply for a property tax exemption pursuant to General Statutes § 12-81(7). If the Assessor determines that the property acquired by the land trust is entitled to the exemption, the property acquires tax exempt status from the date the land trust acquires the property. From that date forward, no taxes are assessed on the property as long as it continues to qualify for the exemption. However, the land trust still owes any taxes on the property that were assessed prior to the transfer of the property, even though the taxes may not be payable
until after the date of acquisition. This tax treatment was required by the Interlude case described below, which Connecticut Public Act 07-170 addresses. Examples of this process are set forth below.
Impact Of The Proposed Ordinance On The Current Tax Laws
Land trusts are entitled to an exemption for taxes from the date they acquire qualified land. The proposed ordinance would also provide an abatement of taxes that had accrued before the acquisition but had not yet become payable.
The proposed ordinance would provide relief to land trusts from Greenwich real and personal property taxes in that it would abate those taxes that become payable on a date following the transfer of property to the land trust, even if such taxes were assessed for a period prior to the date of transfer of property to the land trust.
Reason For The Passage of Public Act 07-170
Public Act 07-170 was passed in response to the Connecticut Supreme Court’s decision in 2003 in the case of Interlude, Inc. v. Skurat, 266 Conn. 130, 831 A.2d 235 (2003). In Interlude, taxes were assessed on October 1, 1991 for the Assessment Year from October 1, 1991 through September 30, 1992. These taxes were payable in quarterly installments on July 1, 1992, October 1, 1992, January 1, 1993 and April 1, 1993. The first installment due July 1, 1992 was paid. Thereafter, a nonprofit organization acquired the property on September 24, 1992. The installments due October 1, 1992, January 1, 1993 and April 1, 1993 were not paid. All of these installments became due after the exempt organization acquired the property, but all had accrued before the acquisition.
The Supreme Court held that the exempt organization was liable for the unpaid taxes because General Statutes § 12-81b provides only for an exemption from taxes assessed after the date of acquisition of property by a qualifying organization. Any taxes assessed prior to the date of acquisition must be paid even if the payment date is some time after the date of acquisition. Public Act 07-170 was enacted to avoid this result and, if approved by local ordinance, will allow land trusts and similar organizations to be able to abate taxes assessed prior to the date of acquisition.
The practice in Connecticut, including the Town of Greenwich, prior to Interlude had been to abate all taxes assessed prior to the date of acquisition in addition to granting tax exempt status going forward from the date of acquisition. The Supreme Court’s decision in Interlude put an end to that practice. The proposed ordinance, if adopted pursuant to Public Act 07-170, would bring back the longstanding practice that was in place prior to Interlude.
Nonprofit Land Conservation Organizations
Public Act 07-170 uses the term “nonprofit land conservation organization.” However, “nonprofit land conservation organization” is not a defined term in the General Statutes. Legislative history indicates that this term was intended to include land trusts and similar land conservation groups. A similar term that is used in the General Statutes under section 47-6b is “nonprofit land-holding organization” which means a nonprofit corporation having as one of its principal purposes the conservation and preservation of land, including, but not limited to a land trust. However, since the legislature has used the term “nonprofit land conservation organization,” the same term is used in the proposed ordinance.
As per the Town Assessor’s Office, the following organizations in Town currently qualify for tax exempt status as land trusts and similar organizations: Greenwich Council of Boy Scouts, Inc., Greenwich Land Trust, Inc., National Audubon Society, Inc., Nature Conservancy of Connecticut, Inc. and Stamford Land Conservation Trust, Inc.
Types Of Taxes To Be Abated And Relevant Timeframes
Public Act 07-170 allows for an abatement of real and personal property taxes as well as the interest on delinquent taxes. The proposed ordinance allows for the abatement of real and personal property taxes but does not include a provision for the abatement of interest on delinquent taxes. Therefore, if the prior owner had failed to pay taxes when due and those taxes had become delinquent, the delinquent taxes are not abated and remain due and payable even after acquisition by a land trust.
Public Act 07-170 is effective only for assessment years starting on or after October 1, 2007. Taxes for the 2007 assessment year are due on July 1, 2008 and January 1, 2009. Therefore, since July 1, 2008 would be when the first tax bill for the 2007 assessment year would be due, the proposed ordinance is drafted so as to apply to transfers of property to a land conservation organization that take place on or after July 1, 2008.
The proposed ordinance, if approved by the RTM, would be included in the Greenwich Municipal Code under Chapter 12, Article 1, Property Tax Exemptions.
Text of Public Act 07-170
Public Act No. 07-170 (Approved June 29, 2007)
( Codified as General Statutes § 12-81dd)
AN ACT CONCERNING TAX ABATEMENTS FOR PROPERTY CONVEYED TO A NONPROFIT LAND CONSERVATION ORGANIZATION.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:
Section 1. (NEW) (Effective from passage and applicable to assessment years commencing on or after October 1, 2007) Any municipality may, upon approval by its legislative body, abate the real or personal property taxes due for any portion of a tax year or the interest on delinquent taxes with respect to any tax paid by a nonprofit land conservation organization that were due for a period before the date of acquisition but which were paid subsequent to the date of acquisition.
Examples Of The Operation Of The Proposed Ordinance
TAX ABATEMENT ORDINANCE
Examples
Assessment Year: October 1 to September 30
Tax Bills: July 1 and January 1 (Each payment represents 50% of total tax liability)
In Each Of The Examples Below – Total Tax Liability Is Assumed To Be $12,000.00. July 1 Bill = $6000.00; January 1 Bill = $6000.00
Example #1
Sale/Transfer Date: September 1, 2008.
Assessment Year: 2007 (October 1, 2007 to September 30, 2008).
Tax Bills: (1) July 1, 2008 (Already Paid) (Delinquent if Not Paid).
(2) January 1, 2009 (Not Yet Paid).
Without Ordinance: January 1, 2009 Tax Bill Will Have to be Paid minus taxes
computed for 1 month period (September 1 - September 30, 2008) because for that 1 month remaining in the 2007 Assessment Year, the property was exempt from taxation because it was owned by a Nonprofit Land Conservation Organization.
Therefore, $5000.00 of the total $6000.00 tax bill for January 1, 2009 will have to be paid.
With Ordinance: January 1, 2009 Tax Bill will not have to be paid.
Amount of taxes Abated = $5000.00
Amount of taxes Exempt = $1000.00
Example #2
Sale Date: May 1, 2009.
Assessment Year: 2008 (October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009).
Tax Bills: (1) July 1, 2009 (Not Yet Paid).
(2) January 1, 2010 (Not Yet Paid).
Without Ordinance: All of July 1, 2009 Tax Bill Must be Paid (for October 2008 to
March 2009 Assessment Period).
1 Month Portion of January 1, 2010 Tax Bill Must be Paid (1/6 of Total January 1 Bill which covers the period from April 1 to May 1 when the property was not owned by Nonprofit Land Conservation Organization).
Taxes Collected On July 1, 2009 - $6000.00
Taxes Collected On January 1, 2010 - $1000.00
With Ordinance: All of July 1, 2009 Tax Bill is Abated because Nonprofit Land Conservation Organization acquired property before July taxes became payable = $6000.00.
1 Month Portion of January 1, 2010 Tax Bill is Abated = $1000.00
The Remainder of January 1, 2010 Tax Bill Would Not Have Been Paid Anyway Because Property Gained Tax Exempt Status for (5) five remaining months (May – September) of 2008 AY.
Total Amount Of Taxes Abated = $7000.000
Amount of taxes Exempt = $5000.00
DEPARTMENT: Conservation Commission August 22, 2008
REFERRED TO: Land Use, Legislative & Rules Committees
VOTES: Board of Selectmen Meeting 7/15/2008 – Approved 3-0-0 BET Meeting 8/22/2008 – Approved 12-0-0
RESOLVED, that the Conservation Commission may accept and use a grant award of $5,000 from Audubon Connecticut and;
FURTHER RESOLVED, to amend the Conservation Commissions budget resolution as follows (changes in bold):
That the Conservation Commission is authorized to accept grants and donation of monies and to collect monies from the sales of its publications that all monies received may be added to the appropriate account upon appropriation by the Board of Estimate and Taxation and the Representative Town Meeting, if necessary under Section 30 of the Charter, to be used by the Commission to publish natural resource books, maps, reports, and pamphlets, to erect bird nest-boxes, to manage nesting habitats of endangered and threatened species, and to undertake other appropriate habitat management pursuant to C.G.S. §7-131 a(b); and
EXPLANATORY COMMENTS
The Conservation Commission and Audubon Connecticut have been working in partnership to develop a management plan for the heron rookery on Great Captain’s Island. GCI is recognized by Audubon as an Important Bird Area and by CT DEP as an important wading shorebird nesting site. It is one of the largest heron
rookeries in Long Island Sound. The $5,000 grant was awarded to the Town by Audubon as part of their commitment to the IBA program. (see attached grant) The grant will be used to do a vegetative survey of the island to aid in the development of the management plan. Audubon approved grant request 6/26/2008.
Attachments
Separate packet
Grant submitted by Town to Audubon
|